Tag Archives: sacd

ONE – a year in the making

ONE – a year in the making

“Bought and listened to the album “One”. Have about 40 albums with hi-res stores (from 96 kHz to DSD128), but this sound never met. It’s incredibly clean, the background is blacker than black. Musical instruments are precise, clear, but not sharp, no porridge, no noise, no haste, no bloated confusing scenes and confusion. This album has a special, unique atmosphere. This amazing adventure. Bravo!”Online music lover

Finally, after nearly a year in the works, the limited edition PS Audio Sonoma Master Series release is shipping. A project to help musicians and further the state of the art in musical reproduction, this collection of pure DSD recorded music is nothing short of stunning, both musically and sonically.

http://www.psaudio.com/products/one-sonoma-master-series/

Hand mastered and curated by Gus Skinas, each of the 10 tracks is a sonic masterpiece you have to have in your collection. This two-disc set includes a dual-layer SACD with pure DSD as well as a uniquely mastered CD layer, playable in any CD transport (more on this in the further description), and a DVD data disc with high resolution 176kHz 24 PCM as well as DSD.

Also included is a beautiful 20 page color booklet. A true collector’s item. Get one in your hands before they’re gone. Ships worldwide.

Buy Here…

Thanks for Listening!

– DE

PS – “The Blue Planet” $1 EP download sale is good thru Friday 4/22 (Earth Day!)… If you have 3 minutes, the soundtrack to this video I created from film I shot of a partial lunar eclipse from the Big Island is “Inverness” from same EP. The synth I played is mixed with the night crickets during the eclipse…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bFiXzSniF8M

Advertisements

DRM – another high ladder out the window

When Sony introduced Super Audio CD (SACD or SA-CD) in the early part of the 21st century, the media platform was rolled out with two main ingredients:

1) Superior sound quality in the form of DSD (Direct Stream Digital) sampling at 2.8MHz, 1-bit

2) Digital Rights Management (DRM) in the case of SACD was provided using digital watermarking where the disc’s physical pits are used to create a signature that prevents copying to another physical media

http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_news/vol17/pdf/tw_saud.pdf

Now over a decade later, Sony announced their High Resolution Audio (HRA) platform that again embraces DSD mastered recordings but this time in the form of downloads.

These DSD downloads are already appearing from titles bearing some of the big names out there like Shelby Lynne, Norah Jones, Counting Crowes, Rickie Lee Jones, as well as classic and classical names including Muddy Waters, John Coltrane, Bille Holiday, Charles Mingus and the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra.

http://store.acousticsounds.com/index.cfm?get=topsellers&Field_cat=372

There are many more from the Sony vaults and other vaults to follow.

Guess what’s missing from this High Fidelity (HRA, Hi-Rez) campaign?
DRM! Copy protection! It’s out the window!!

Of course the whole world has already gone through this a few times starting with Napster which was forced to shut down (kind of like our recent government) in July, 2001 as a contributor, not a perpetrator, of copyright infringement. It had been operating for a couple years as the shared storage for P2P music downloads (they didn’t call it a Cloud then). In 2001 they had around 25 million subscribers.

I have been online with free downloads as MP3s since 1995. I still have free downloads online. Napster has been closed, bankrupt, reemerged, then bought and sold to Rhapsody. Regardless, the music is still getting moved around into players and then people’s ears…

There have been many other companies and initiatives in this free distribution direction. Somehow Apple’s iTunes thinks there is a “safe” limit of around 5 or 6 “authorized” PCs/Macs to allow receipt and hosting of their downloads.

What I’m asking is, will anyone *always* download something that’s free and *never* download something that costs money?

So what is DRM to anyone? Music is shared. Music is bought. As Gillian Welch sings in her 2002 ‘Time (The Revelator)’ song: “Everything is free now”. She goes on to sing “That’s what they say…everything i ever done…gonna give it away…”

A record industry that has been obsessed with making it difficult if not impossible to copy a good recording is now being led by a company that embraces digital file downloads which are highly likely to live (be copied) in more than one location at one time.

Jane Siberry began offering her music online many years ago (already) based on the premise that the artist (and the Sheeba Records label in her case) should not be in a position to decide for the listener what the recording is worth. Rather the listener should decide what it’s worth!  She still runs the web store that way. You can set the price. It’s up to you.

I sold CDs at shows that way for many years – you pay (or not pay) what you want. Self-service all the way. I was also opening some shows for Jane Siberry at that time.

What I found over the years, was that it never mattered what price I set or didn’t set on selling music. I sold about the same amounts no matter what it cost the buyer! My free downloads are not especially popular because they are free. They follow the same cycles as the stuff getting paid for. It’s more about the music…

Sure music is a business and an industry and everyone should get paid. But who is everyone? I think the recent official DRM ladder removal may be a precursor to the removal of some business layers that maybe shouldn’t be there or are at least are not necessary.

It may end up being an unintended consequence of pointing to the essence of “free”, which to me means “independent”.

Start your own label, see what happens…

“but i’m gonna do it anyway
even if it doesn’t pay….”
– gillian welch

kathmandu

kathmandu

free dsd stereo and 5.1 Mch downloads

Visit multichannel DSD DAC maker exaSound and download both a stereo and a 5.1 surround sound track of mine called “The Old King” from The Window SACD…

http://www.exasound.com/Blog/tabid/74/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/103/David-Elias–Free-DSD-Downloads-in-Stereo-and-51.aspx

Complete DSD Downloads of my SACDs “The Window” and “Crossing” are now online at http://www.SuperHiRez.com and http://www.davidelias.com

Aloha!

david elias - the window (hybrid 5.1 sacd, dsd download)

david elias – the window (hybrid 5.1 sacd, dsd download)

push me some surround – multichannel dsd downloads

Direct Stream Digital (DSD)

Direct Stream Digital (DSD)

It was bound to happen, I just didn’t know when. But as of today I have added the 5.1 multichannel mixes for my 2 released SACDs “The Window” (2003) and “Crossing” (2005) to my online DSD Download offerings.

This is not completely coincidental to the fact that Sony and several audiophile retail outlets have recently announced their commitment to a Hi-Res Audio (HRA) initiative that includes consumer audio products (players, amplifiers, etc.) that support DSD (Direct Stream Digital, the hi-res digital format) as well as DSD download services.

Check out what Sony is doing with DSD Downloads as of just the past week’s annoucement:
http://discover.store.sony.com/High-Resolution-Audio/

More on all of that on an upcoming blog post…it’s draft title is:
when music matters…climbing back out of a sonic hole

DSD Downloads Grow Up…

I released the first DSD Disc download of “The Window” as stereo DSF files in November, 2009. This year I released the same DSF file format for “Crossing”. It was only a question of time before I put the 5,1 surround sound mixes (multichannel or MCH) online for downloads, now that some of the media player software such as foobar2000 supports it, and some of the external DSD DACs out there such as exaSound’s e28 also support it.

It’s a new ready-to-sit-down-and-listen world all over again. We recorded “The Window” directly to DSD almost exactly 11 years ago, in the 3 days prior to the Thanksgiving weekend in Boulder in 2002. Most of the world was still on 56k dialup modems and ISDN BRI was running at 64k. You wouldn’t try downloading a 500MB DSD MCH file (one song!) under that setup.

You can read Brian Moura’s High Fidelity Review accounts of both of these original SACD works when they were first released the links below.  His post this afternoon of my new DSD MCH downloads is at Quadrophonic Quad

The Window (High Fidelity Review – 2003)
http://www.highfidelityreview.com/da…est-album.html

The Window

The Window – DSD stereo and MCH download

David Elias – Acoustic Guitar, Vocal & Harmonica
Sally Van Meter – Dobro, Weissenborn & Lap Steel
Matt Flinner – Mandolin & Bouzouki
Ross Martin – Electric & Baritone Guitars
Eric Thorin – Upright Bass
Marc Dalio – Drums
John Magnie – Keyboards & Accordion

Album Tracks
1. Freedom On The Freeway
2. Summer Wind
3.
Go Down Easy
4.
The Old King
5.
Something About You
6.
Half An Hour Away (Intro)
7.
Half An Hour Away
8.
Her Name Is A.
9.
Transcendental Deprivation Part III
10.
Season Of The Fall
11.
The Window (Intro)
12.
The Window
13.
Picture Of Nothing
Crossing (High Fidelity Review – 2005)
http://www.highfidelityreview.com/ne…und-sound.htm

Crossing - DSD stereo and MCH download

Crossing – DSD stereo and MCH download

David Elias – Acoustic Guitar, Vocal & Harmonica
Sally Van Meter – Weissenborn Guitar & Dobro
Matt Flinner – Mandolin
Eric Thorin – Upright Bass
Eric Moon – Keyboards & Accordian
Marc Dalio – Drums
Chris Kee – Upright Bass
David Philips – Pedal Steel
John Harvard – Electric Guitar
Peter Tucker – Drums
Reid Dennis – Percussion
Eric Humphrey – Organ

Album Tracks
1. Crossing (Lonely Bells)
2. Mend My Mind
3. Close My Eyes
4. Morning Light / Western Town
5. Rodeo On A Ridge
6. Red Tail Guide
7. Heaven’s Destiny
8. One More Savior
9. Above The Creek
10. The Riddle Song
11. Changing Down
12. If I Had My Way

Why Surround?

There were some very specific goals that I had in mind for these surround projects which Brian’s articles refer to.  To list them succinctly:

  • minimal micing
  • live studio stereo mixes of the performance and the room to provide natural reverb in the mixes (stereo and surround)
  • a minimal 8 tracks on the Sonoma DSD recorder to be able to more directly recreate the ambient surround characteristics of the band in a semi- (The Window) or full circle (Crossing)
  • live performances in good studios to capture the natural bleed and ghosting of the instruments across the mics using no isolation, even for the drum kit
  • no edits or overdubs for 99% of the sessions to accomplish accurate acoustic reproduction
  • lots of space :)

From Brian’s articles there are quotes of mine stating both projects’ intentions:

“The Window has gone from being simply an idea of recording an acoustic band, live in a studio, to being a Super Audio CD (SACD) in Surround Sound (Multichannel). We recorded material live as a full band for 3 days. The multichannel result is something you don’t often get to hear. A 5.1 surround sound playback of a live studio recording without cut/paste edits or overdubs. Both the texture and the space come through in the playback, and are most present when listening to the disc on an SACD multichannel audio system. If it sounds “really live” it’s because it was recorded that way in Direct Stream Digital (DSD) with multichannel playback in mind. It’s as if you are sitting in the middle of the studio listening to the band recording.”

On Crossing…

“Philosophically and creatively I really prefer 8 tracks if possible. This keeps micing to a minimum which has benefits and I think lends to the more natural recreation of the ambient space in both surround and stereo. The other advantage for me with 8 tracks is that the DSD recordings are digitally mixed on the Sonoma which keeps it first generation all the way through to the DSD layer you are hearing.”

“Most of these songs were recorded as live takes with no overdubs. Exceptions to that approach are tracks 4, 9 and 12 [Crossing] which introduced the electric instruments as overdubs. This SA-CD was recorded directly to DSD and captured the natural ambient characteristics of the band and the room with the intention of mixing for both Stereo and 5.1 Surround Sound. With that in mind, we used a minimal approach to microphones and seated the musicians in a circle.”

Brian’s summary critique reads like this:

“When describing the sound of Elias’ previous Super Audio CD release The Window, I described it as ‘a reference quality recording’. Crossing is clearly in the same category and some might even say it sounds a bit better.”

Why DSD??

This post just went up on Positive Feedback Online as a reblog of mine. Chief Editor David W. Robinson was kind enough to do the layout and post it with photos and text I had provided him with. It is relevant to the whole discourse here… My Blogosphere Thoughts on DSD

If you are an audiophile and are getting into multichannel DSD playback or are thinking about it, both of these album downloads ($24.95) are Pure DSD without edits and overdubs except the electric guitar and pedal steel added to the 3 tracks mentioned above. I’m thrilled that the consumer products out there in the forms of both software media players and hardware DSD USB DACs allow the discerning listeners to get to the very very nice artistic side of tech + art = art...

I sure hope all this paves the way for more artists to turn to DSD as their recording media of choice,

Aloha!

Feel free to post your comments!

Feel equally free to contact me with questions you have using the contact form on my web site!  http://www.davidelias.com/contact.html

art + tech = art :: less is more

The biggest incentive I had to start this blog was to offer my experience and maybe some technical clarifications or explanations to those interested in hi-res recordings and DSD downloads + SACD discs in particular. No doubt there are a lot of confusing technologies and messages out there. But I am focused on the desire to hear high quality acoustic recordings. The source of the recordings might be a live performance in a studio or on a stage or from an earlier recording (master) either analog (say 1/2 or 1/4 inch tape recordings or masters) or digital.

I have had a fairly unique vantage point on a lot of this, especially during the early 10 year SACD growth period between 2000 and 2010. I wasn’t part of the music recording industry though I was a working and recording musician in the SF Bay Area. So I was able to see the creation of an industry segment that I was independent of.

I had no manager, no booking agent, no record contract, PR agent or any of the rest of it. I wasn’t really looking for any of that either. What I wanted to do was to make good recordings of my songs. I also wanted to perform in places that sounded good to me. I had already climbed the DIY music ladder from its infancy in those first web+browser days in 1994 and 1995 when my first self-made CD called ‘Lost in the Green’ came out. The web at that time offered me a direct communication path to public and college radio stations all over the U.S. as well as to other countries. This was new! I don’t recall any of the stations broadcasting their shows on the web at that point, just posting info including contact email.

Most importantly to me the web offered direct communication to those station DJ’s. So I started studying their playlists on the endless folk programs I searched for to see where my music might fit stylistically. Then I found the DJ and sent him or her an email to see if they would be willing to receive and test drive my DIY (Do It Yourself) disc and package. The search engines I used then were AltaVista and Infoseek. Google hadn’t been born and Yahoo was soon new on the scene. The browsers being used were first Mosaic and then Netscape. Soon to eclipse them all was Microsoft’s Internet Explorer released in 1996. It would reign fairly undisputed for about 8 years until Firefox showed up. My web pages were all hand typed HTML as there were no WYSIWYG tools like Dreamweaver available yet.

The DJ’s were usually surprised in those years to hear from someone like me doing these things on my own. They were also almost always open to my inquiry and if so I mailed them discs with a printed copy of the email and a hand scrawled thank you. Music uploads were not that commonplace yet as most people connected to the Internet were using a 19.2k or 33k Zoom or Hayes dialup modem. It was slow! ISDN BRI at 64k digital would come and go in the U.S. DSL appeared then and cable modem shortly after that. But mass music uploads and downloads were only just going to begin occuring in the mid to late 90’s on web sites like the original MP3.com which I was also part of. It was all 100% free until Steve Jobs saw the window of opportunity there and iTunes was born. More on that another time.

I got my songs played on radio stations as far away as Hong Kong. I had created my own website and email under my San Jose ISP at Netcom. I kept an up to date list of all the stations adding me to their program playlists. I was very persistent and it was very exciting.

I was recording with a Tascam DA-88 16-bit, 48k 8-track recorder that used Hi-8 video tape to write to. Roger Powell loaned me his to start. I later bought my own DA-38. I mixed “Lost in the Green” on my then new DIY gigging gear from Mackie. I even used my tiny Mackie 1202 mixer with 2 bands of EQ and L/R panning to mix my first CD. No effects like reverb or anything else were used, just treble / bass and left / right.

I still use the same Mackie at most of my shows like from the back of the flatbed truck I played on last Friday in a breezeway between 2 Thai and Vietnamese restaurants in Hilo, Hawaii during a big rainstorm. When I performed recently with my trio The New Containers in a small club in Pahoa I mixed the sound onstage through the same Mackie and gave the house a single mono feed for their PA. This is to preserve the original sound captured from the acoustic guitar, vocal and other mics including percussion. I also still have the Tascam Hi-8 recorder and the source recording tapes of my first 4 CD’s (Lost in the Green – 1995, Time Forgets – 1997, The Blue Planet – 1998, Half an Hour Away – 2000).

I was making simple acoustic recordings but they sounded good enough to me to share with the world. I was into ambient acoustics and in 2000 recorded a trio with only guitar/voice/harmonica, flute or tenor sax, and mandolin live in an empty performance theater on the Highway 1 coast in Half Moon Bay, CA. The CD became “Half an Hour Away” by David Elias & The Great Unknown. Again it used no effects. I used mics onstage to capture the trio and mics in the room to capture the room where the audience would have sat. It became my natural reverb in the mix. All of these recordings were 8-tracks or less, mixed to stereo by me to stereo for mastering and CD printing.

My first CD packages in 1995 and 1997 were done with Gus “Guinness” Skinas‘s help on an early digital mastering machine from Studer-Editech called the Dyaxis. We created a gold master CD disc that could be reproduced directly. We also created the full color insert booklets with photos and song lyrics using Pagemaker. This was submitted to Discmakers for printing on a 10MB Zip Disk. They had never gotten anything like that (ready to print) from anyone before.

I got introduced to DSD in its early days. It was debuted as a commercial (major studio and record label target market) solution to what I’ll call the PCM Quandary which had slammed into the music industry in the early 80’s, quickly displacing vinyl and cassette. The dilemma I observed with PCM and in particular with what the industry calls Redbook CD (which is just the standard CD digital PCM format of 44.1k sampling using 16 bits and encoded as WAV or AIFF files) was that the standard was far from good enough for any real use in terms of preserving and reproducing original audio quality!

This meant that all the messages fed to the buying public (us) for say 20 years about the nice clean sound of CD compared to tape and vinyl (no pops, scratches, hiss or noise, remember?) were pretty bogus. Clean maybe yes, but accurate, well… no. What about warm and ambient and atmospheric like the way we hear things naturally? Well… no. What about accurately preserving the reflective resonant and decaying natures of sounds in a room? (Pick any room they are all sonically different.) Well… nope.

My list of PCM deficiencies goes on and on. Tied to the dying art of listening (which I wrote about the other morning but WordPress lost over half of when I tried to post it — I’ll save more Drafts now — Ouch) is the art of audio reproduction. In today’s gee whiz techno-world there are of course “competing standards” for the best ways to record and reproduce music. PCM sampling has been amped up to 96k and 24 bits (96/24) and well beyond to add depth and sonic accuracy. But to me that’s just the tip of its problematic iceberg and seemed to come only as a band-aid afterthought by those already heavily invested in PCM technology. Even worse is that CD’s which are still the target master destination for many projects are still following the same Redbook standard of 16-bit 44.1k sampling. So those listening to a 96/24 download might be hearing what was originally a 44/16 master recording simply upsampled to the higher rate. That is like taking a 640×480 pixel photo and expanding it to 1920×1280 on a large flatscreen. It doesn’t improve the quality of the photo. It can’t because the bits weren’t there when the photo was created.

Another dimension of the problems with industry recorded discs and broadcasts was tied to the large amounts of gain (volume) and compression used to maximize the output of the mastered tracks as finished stereo WAV or AIFF files. Think of all the bass you’ve heard from cars at stoplights, coming at you through either open or closed windows. Think of the crunched sound of singers and the uber-sizzling sounds of drum cymbals and horns and of course monster guitar solos. A lot of this is achieved mathematically in either a device sitting in a studio equipment rack or from a set of music editing tools on a computer. Remember the VU meters on audio equipment like tape recorders? That meter has a red warning zone at 0db. Any loud signal pushing the needle over into the red zone above 0db has the potential and likelihood of beginning to distort (clip) the audio output you hear. So on the other side of the compression and gain devices and software are often added what are called limiters that detect any signals coming before they can clip or distort and squeeze them back down to the acceptable level desired, say 0db.

The goal of much of the processed industry sound became something on the order of finding ways to maximize the audio signals at all times such that the VU meters would be “pinned” to the 0db mark without going into the red but still staying just under that red zone at all times, Lots of manipulation!

I’ve read that a lot of this came about with early FM radio transmissions so that the songs going out over the airwaves would blast into FM receivers in cars and homes with as much sound as possible. It was all about quantity, not quality. Think of TV commercials that come on and everyone jumps up or grabs the remote to turn it down. That’s what they do to radio! That’s what they do to lots of commercial CD’s!

Essentially what we saw and heard from digital technology through the use of tools available through the 80’s and 90’s were convenient ways to manipulate the sounds in order to broadcast, digitally transfer and directly playback recordings. As tiny speakers and then subwoofers began to get connected to most computers on the web, these needs escalated by a demanding public saying “Give us more sizzle! Give us more bass!”

Around 2000 I happened to get introduced to the format of audio digital encoding called DSD which stands for Direct Stream Digital. Whatever I say about any of this is just what I have come to understand over the years working as a musician with the tools developed and watching a new derivative of the music industry shoot up mostly in the audiophile niche based on this (pretty amazing!) technology. I could certainly be wrong with any of my facts or dates. Still I’ve been directly involved in creating productions for stereo and 5.1 surround sound using these tools and working with and learning from some of its true instigators in the studio and record industries. So I’ve cut my teeth on it as they say.

What Sony and Philips realized as the original developers of the digital CD technology delivered in the early 80’s, was that this format was completely useless to them as a way to archive the aging master tape library of recordings in the Sony vaults. It wasn’t nearly good enough to support the accurate transfer of their physically decaying master tapes to a more permanent digital format.

DSD came about in their labs in the 90’s as a much better way to do this. Sometime around 2000 I saw and heard a 2-track (stereo) prototype DSD workstation. It was a digital mastering machine for the archival of those decaying master tapes. But it was also a stereo recorder of course. This was not software running on a commercial PC or Mac at the time. It was its own small box with a small screen and keyboard.

What I heard then began to forever change the way I listen to music. Nearly 15 years later I feel I am still in a transition of learning how to divest my ears and listening skills from the filtered, limited, crunched and sizzled music that the industry has thrived on, largely through demand.

If you give listeners a recording that is limited to frequencies between 20Hz and 20kHz and has been crunched and sizzled to keep those tweeters and bass speakers fully occupied at all times, and the listeners ask for more of the same if not crunchier and with even more sizzle, then who are you to deny them their request? That’s business.

Take a walk through a forest or any grove of trees, say rainbow eucalyptus. What you hear are both near and distant reflections of sound through the canopy and beyond extending upwards into infinity until they slowly disappear into space. Listen to the leaves rustling together in the breeze and to an occasional branch squeaking against another. There are birds and insects chirping and humming. You also hear the lower registers of sounds rooted into the earth along with the trees, providing a solid bottom that also has no end other than something absolute. This could include the sounds of your footfalls as you walk. The air is the catalyst for all of this as it allows the audio signals to move through it carrying each source of sound to some surface destination where it is reflected and so bounces somewhere else until it reaches your ears or decays without being heard. Each reflection changes the color and level of the sound. The absence of a sound (just air) is just as important as the presence of a sound. The mix is the sum of all these reflections arriving from all the different locations surrounding you to your ears.

When you stand perfectly still you are experiencing reception from 360 degrees. What you hear behind you is just as important to the natural experience as what is in front of you. If you turn around, everything changes in your perceived reception. It is all spatial.

I can compare listening to pure DSD recordings in 5.1 surround sound as a similar experience. They are not like listening to most music as much as they are like listening to nature. My goal as a recording musician and songwriter has been to get as many blocks to that kind of listening experience on a reproduction (be it SACD, DSD download, CD, FLAC/MP3) removed as much as possible.

DSD recording has let me do that, along with the proper minimal but fully spatial microphone setup. This began shortly after I heard those first Sony archive tape masters transferred to DSD. I recorded a series of songs as a solo singer-songwriter to DSD using 3 very good microphones and preamps. This was recorded by Gus Skinas directly to DSD without a mixer in the path. One mic was in front of me catching my guitar and voice directly. The other two mics were slightly above me and equally spaced to my left and right. These captured the stereo image of what I was delivering to the room. It is something of a classic studio microphone setup, at least it was in past decades.

By recording directly to DSD without anything else electronically in the path we were able to capture the audio experience in a highly accurate way. There was no EQ (treble and bass) being added or subtracted. Those controls didn’t even exist in this setup. It was as simple as you can get. Less is more.

The honesty of those recordings was startling to both Gus and I. There are no equations or proofs that can explain how something feels when you hear it. All I can say is that from those experiments I realized that the essential elements of the kinds of recordings I wanted to make were based simply on air movement. DSD was able to capture and preserve that air movement, resonating from my voice and body singing and from the guitar strings and guitar body I was playing.

The frequency range of DSD is 0Hz to 100kHz. Human hearing range is between 20Hz and 20kHz (the lowest and highest sounds that one without hearing loss can perceive). CD and PCM follow these hearing limits exactly and discard the rest of the frequencies. This is how they got rid of the hiss and pops! I am convinced that the eucalyptus forest I described does not sound or feel the same with a 20Hz to 20kHz filter applied. Something would be missing. It might be similar to what you would hear if you put on some earmuffs but didn’t turn the sound down. Maybe a lot would be missing as the air would be robbed of a large segment of what it usually had to carry and distribute, regardless of what we thought we could hear.

Between 2003 and 2005 I went on to record different acoustic bands I was lucky enough to assemble in different studios in this same fashion of minimal micing and direct DSD recording, usually with no effects added. These were recorded on enhanced versions of the 2-track Sony prototype that went on to become the Sonoma DSD workstation. It was capable of recording up to 8-tracks at a time. We used a Sony software mixer application to properly EQ (treble/bass) and pan (left vs right or somewhere in between) each track to recreate the session environment as accurately as possible, giving the listener (you) the perfect seat in the studio, as if you were there. This was done twice from scratch: once for stereo (2 speaker) playback, and once for 5.1 surround sound playback (5 speakers and 0, 1 or 2 subwoofers).

Today the DSD playback of these recordings (“The Window – DSD Download“, “Crossing – 5.1 and stereo hybrid SACD“, ) as either SACD discs or DSD downloads is 100% the same as our final mastered mix of those tracks. It will never age or change sonically as tape would.  Two other DSD source recordings on Sonoma are “XING” (acoustic trio)  and “Live in San Gregorio” (large band). They should be available as DSD Downloads sometime in the near future.

Thank you Sony and Philips for bringing technology to the creation and preservation of art.

20130818-062228.jpg